вірус Китайський коронавірус крокує по планеті

[Dilbert]

What to Know About Vaccinations for Children 12 to 15 in N.Y.

This week, the Food and Drug Administration authorized use of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds. It is not the last hurdle: A federal advisory committee must meet to make recommendations for the vaccine’s use in the age group, and a state task force oversees the final approval.

But Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo said this week that vaccinations are set to be cleared for 12- to 15-year-olds as soon as tomorrow.

Here’s what you need to know:

What do the studies show?

Clinical trials have found that children in the age group may safely receive the dose already available for adults, and indicate that it is highly effective at preventing symptomatic illness.

The side effects for the children involved in the trials were comparable to those seen in trial participants who were 16 to 25 years old, my colleague Apoorva Mandavilli reported. Scientists also agreed that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine seemed to meet all expectations regarding safety and efficacy.

[Dilbert]

What about children under 12?

Pfizer and BioNTech have begun testing the vaccine in children ages 2 to 11. If trial results are positive, the companies expect to apply to the F.D.A. in September for emergency authorization to administer doses to those age groups.

Results from trials of Moderna’s vaccine in 12- to 17-year-olds are expected to come soon. AstraZeneca is testing its vaccine in children 6 months and older, while Johnson & Johnson plans to wait for trial results in participants over 12 before turning to younger children.

[Citizen UA]

AstraZeneca is testing its vaccine in children 6 months and older,

 

Цікаво було би подивитися на малахольних батьків, які дали добро на оті досліди над своїми дітьми. Чи вони у країнах третього світу свої тести проводять?

[Uki]

Цікаво було би подивитися на малахольних батьків, які дали добро на оті досліди над своїми дітьми. Чи вони у країнах третього світу свої тести проводять?

 

Якщо воно досліджене вже на десятках міліонів дорослих та десятках тисяч 12 річних, то в чому проблема?

[Citizen UA]

Якщо воно досліджене вже на десятках міліонів дорослих та десятках тисяч 12 річних, то в чому проблема?

 

Ти б дав дозвіл на досліди з твоєю дитиною віком 1 рік?

[Uki]

Ти б дав дозвіл на досліди з твоєю дитиною віком 1 рік?

 

Там з 2 років........ Якби тій дитині довелось би проводити час в натовпі з ризиком зараження - то звичайно дав би.......... Якщо нема проблем з 12 річними то вірогідність того що будуть проблеми у меньших за віком практично нульова.........

 

Просто так без особливих на те потреб - не дав би ......  

Змінено 12 травня, 2021 користувачем Uki

[Вуйко_З_Онтарио]

У нас Астру окончательно запретили. Наигрались

[Citizen UA]

Там з 2 років..

 

AstraZeneca is testing its vaccine in children 6 months and older,

[Uki]

Я думав ти про "Pfizer and BioNTech have begun testing the vaccine in children ages 2 to 11"

 

В 6 міс не дав би звичайно........ знайшов би спосіб дистанціювати краще...... 

[coolzak]

В деяких дуже демократичних штатах пропихували закони що на вакцинацію неповнолітніх згоди батьків нетреба.Тільки згода дитини в школі

[Citizen UA]

Креативний підхід до вакцинації 

 

Governor Mike DeWine

 

@GovMikeDeWine

·

7 год

 

 

Two weeks from tonight on May 26th, we will announce a winner of a separate drawing for adults who have received at least their first dose of the vaccine. This announcement will occur each Wednesday for five weeks, and the winner each Wednesday will receive one million dollars.

[Вуйко_З_Онтарио]

У нас сначала сказали что можно вторую колоть через четыре месяца после первой, хотя фармакологи давали окно в три недели, потом сказали что похрену где первая где вторая вакцина Можно мешать в кучу и разными колоться, хотя фармакологи сказали что парные  вакцины должны быть от одного производителя. Но внезапно вчера запретили Зенеку. Совсем. ВОбщем бардак нарастает

[Ali(UA)]

Все у нас даже в школах маски убрали. реальная демократия.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/schools-ditch-student-mask-requirements-growing-numbers

хоть какие то дебаты а не овечья покорность и комсомол.

[Uki]

Все у нас даже в школах маски убрали. реальная демократия.

 

[Ali(UA)]

что уки завидно? у вас там против линии партии хоть кто то выступает?

[Uki]

Якої партії? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?     

 

Ти б ще проти сонця виступив 

Змінено 13 травня, 2021 користувачем Uki

[Ali(UA)]

Якої партії? Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?

 

Ти б ще проти сонця виступив

ну у тебя и сравнения.. доктор фаучи это ваше солнышко? и мне потом будут про КПСС рассказывать Змінено 13 травня, 2021 користувачем Ali(UA)

[Uki]

 причому тут доктор фаучі

[coolzak]

В нас на роботі після вакцини дві кобіти вже пару днів не виходять.Головні болі,крутиться голова ,загальна слабість.

Пропихують вакцинацію як можуть,менеджери кожний день втирають як це файно вакцинуватись,питаються в людей чи вже вкололись,може дати оплачуваний вихвдний щоб піти на укол і тд.Народ колеться бо peer pressure або думають що скоро без справки роботи не буде а рахунки треба платити.Вішають графіки як мало ускладнень і іншу лабуду.

[coolzak]

Manitoba Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist: 56% of positive “cases” are not infectious

 

Posted On: May 11, 2021

 

WINNIPE The Justice Centre represents churches and individuals who are challenging government lockdown restrictions in the Court of Queen’s Bench as unjustified violations of the Charter freedoms to associate, worship, and assemble peacefully. The hearing commenced on May 3, 2021 and is continuing this week.

 

The onus is on the Manitoba Government to justify its restrictions on Charter rights and freedoms as being reasonable, necessary and beneficial.

 

One of the crucial issues in this trial is the operation and reliability of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test that is used by governments across Canada, including the Manitoba Government, to diagnose Covid and measure its spread.

 

The Westphalian Times explains PCR tests as follows:

 

The current COVID testing is based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) – “a fast and inexpensive technique used to ‘amplify’ – copy – small segments of DNA.” Many internationally recognized experts on virology and PCR testing are questioning if the tests have been made overly sensitive and many positives are the result of long dead and no longer contagious virus or even contamination in labs. PCR testing was invented to find genetic viral material in a sample and has not traditionally been used as the sole method for identifying people suffering from a viral or bacterial disease.

 

COVID testing is typically performed using a nasopharyngeal swab, a 6-inch long swab inserted deep into the nostril. The swab is rotated for a while and then it is sent to a lab where a PCR test will dramatically amplify the amount of genetic material captured and then compare it to the DNA or RNA of a particular segment of the COVID virus (reference RNA).

 

To get enough genetic material to test, the PCR process increases the genetic material present by copying it and then copying it again, over and over. Each of these increasing steps is called a “cycle” and the genetic material in the solution is reacted against the reference DNA to determine a positive. If the sample contains a large amount of COVID virus it will react positive after only a few cycles, while a sample with small amounts of genetic material will require more cycles to amplify enough genetic material to get a positive result.

 

Since the PCR test amplifies traces of COVID-19 through cycles, a lower number of cycles needed to get a positive suggests the presence of a higher viral load for the person being tested and therefore a higher contagion potential.

 

The number of cycling required to identify viral material in a given sample is called the cycle threshold (Ct).

 

The Justice Centre’s expert medical witnesses, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, world-famous epidemiologist and Professor of Medicine from Stanford University, and Dr. Thomas Warren, infectious disease specialist and medical microbiologist, both provided evidence that the PCR test is unreliable in determining whether a person is infectious with the actual Covid-19 disease.

 

Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist Dr. Jared Bullard is a witness for the Manitoba government in this hearing. Questioned under oath by Justice Centre lawyers on Monday May 10, Dr. Bullard acknowledged that the PCR test has significant limitations. The head of Cadham Provincial Laboratory in Winnipeg, Dr. Bullard admitted that PCR test results do not verify infectiousness, and were never intended to be used to diagnose respiratory illnesses.

 

Dr. Bullard testified that PCR tests can be positive for up to 100 days after an exposure to the virus, and that PCR tests do nothing more than confirm the presence of fragments of viral RNA of the target SARS CO-V2 virus in someone’s nose. He testified that, while a person with Covid-19 is infectious for a one-to-two week period, non-viable (harmless) viral SARS CO-V2 fragments remain in the nose, and can be detected by a PCR test for up to 100 days after exposure.

 

Dr. Bullard testified that the most accurate way to determine whether someone is actually infectious with Covid is to attempt to grow a cell culture in the lab from a patient sample. If a cell culture will not grow the virus in the lab, a patient is likely not infectious. A study from Dr. Bullard and his colleagues found that only 44% of positive PCR test results would actually grow in the lab.

 

Dr. Bullard’s findings call into question the practice used in Manitoba (and elsewhere in Canada) of the results of classifying positive PCR tests as “cases,” which implies infectivity. Equating positive PCR tests to infectious cases, as so many provinces have done over the course of the past 13 months, is incorrect and inaccurate, according to this Manitoba Government witness.

 

Dr. Bullard acknowledged that he has been closely studying the correlation between Cycle threshold (Ct) value and infectiousness since at least May 7, 2020. Dr. Bullard acknowledged that Manitoba has known for some time that a given PCR test’s Ct value is inversely correlated with infectiousness. This means that testing for Covid at higher threshold levels can result in false positives as explained in this article. Even the World Health Organization (WHO) notes that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed.

 

Weak results are those run at higher thresholds (more cycles). For example, someone with a positive PCR test that is run at 18 cycles is more likely to be sick and infectious than someone who has a test run at a Ct value of 40.

 

Dr. Bullard confirmed this was one of the first studies of its kind linking Ct value to infectiousness, and his study confirmed the findings of other studies in France and elsewhere.

 

Dr. Bullard also testified that Ct value (how many amplification cycles were used in a given PCR test to reach a positive test result) is significant as a proxy or indicator for infectiousness.

 

However, despite Dr. Bullard’s findings and recommendations in his two peer-reviewed studies, Manitoba still does not consider Ct values as a proxy for infectiousness in its public health response to Covid-19. Both Dr. Bullard and Manitoba Chief Medical Officer Dr. Brent Roussin confirmed under cross-examination that Ct values are not provided to public health officials by laboratories. Dr. Roussin admitted that he could mandate that the Ct value be provided to him, but that he has not done so.

 

Some jurisdictions, for example Florida, do consider Ct value in their public health response to Covid.

 

Finally, it should be noted that some Canadian news agencies have quoted Dr. Bullard as testifying that a positive PCR tests indicates infectivity 99.9% of the time. This is incorrect. Rather, Dr. Bullard testified that a PCR test will detect any viral RNA that is present in a sample 99.9% of the time. However, Dr. Bullard testified that determining whether or not a sample is actually infectious (containing a viable virus, capable of replicating) needs to be confirmed by lab culture. As noted, only 44% of the “positive” samples using a Ct of 18 returned a viable lab culture. Samples tested at a Ct of over 25, according to Dr. Bullard’s report, produced no viable lab cultures.

 

Manitoba has confirmed that it utilizes Ct’s of up to 40, and even 45 in some cases. This indicates “cases” resulting from such tests (above a Ct of 25) are almost certainly not actually infectious.

[Вуйко_З_Онтарио]

зато бизнес какой. В Торонто ПЦР тест для бессимптомников - от 160 до 600 долларов плюс налог. 

[zero]

 

 

Пропихують вакцинацію як можуть,менеджери кожний день втирають як це файно вакцинуватись,питаються в людей чи вже вкололись,може дати оплачуваний вихвдний щоб піти на укол і тд.Народ колеться бо peer pressure або думають що скоро без справки роботи не буде а рахунки треба платити.Вішають графіки як мало ускладнень і іншу лабуду.

смерть або рахунки

[coolzak]

Логіка така що смерть хз а рахунки щомісяця

[zero]

незаплатиш рахунки - буде матеріальна смерть, спочатку, а потім переживання і .... хз

[Uki]

CDC зняло рекомендацію носити маску повністю вакцінованим......

[Вуйко_З_Онтарио]

тут пишут кроме тюрем, самолетов. госпиталей и прочих изрядных скоплений народа

А в каких то штатах по-прежнему по две маски.

[coolzak]

Залишилось ввести підтвердження вакцинації яке здалеку видно.Нашивка на одежі,татуха на лобі чи шо.А то невакциновані будуть моментом користуватись і теж без масок ходити

[Вуйко_З_Онтарио]

Точно. Жёлтые и шестиугольные

[coolzak]

Цікаво чи Гітлері казали що жиди брудні і розповсюджують хвороби?

[Ali(UA)]

CDC зняло рекомендацію носити маску повністю вакцінованим......

Сонце дозволило Укі зняти маску. Укі я її вже місяців 6 навіть не надівав)) так що ті угоди своїм родичаи можуть шось дозволяти чи ні.