Перейти до змісту

Китайський коронавірус крокує по планеті


Citizen UA

Recommended Posts

Виявляється FDA не затвердило на постійно вакцину від Пфайзера а лише продовжило емердженсі авторизацію

https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download

А тицьніть мене пліз де саме про продовження емердженсі в документі.

Хочу декому в носа потикати.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No medical exemptions for B.C. vaccine card ‘blatant discrimination’, disabled activist says

Some British Columbians cannot be vaccinated due to allergies to vaccine components 

https://www.surreynowleader.com/news/no-medical-exemptions-for-b-c-vaccine-card-blatant-discrimination-disabled-activist-says/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Я погано англійською читаю. Дайте пряму цитату, я в тексті знайду.

I. Criteria for Issuance of Authorization

I have concluded that the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 when administered as described in the Scope of Authorization (Section II) meets the criteria for issuance of an authorization under Section 564© of the Act, because:

 

II.

  1. SARS-CoV-2 can cause a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, including severe respiratory illness, to humans infected by this virus;

  2. Based on the totality of scientific evidence available to FDA, it is reasonable to believe that Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine may be effective in preventing COVID-19, and that, when used under the conditions described in this authorization, the known and potential benefits of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine when used to prevent COVID-19 outweigh its known and potential risks; and

  3. There is no adequate, approved, and availablealternative to the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19.

а ше за доступних FDA доказів (evidence available to FDA), можливо ефективна у запопіганні ковіду may be effective in preventing COVID-1 :lol2: 

its known and potential risks -  а які не знані ризики, то ми у доміку

 

класні юристи у них там - обтікаємо так

 

цікаво чи тепер вимога підписувати бамагу про несення відповідальності

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfizer Inc. will supply Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine either directly or through authorized distributor(s),11 to emergency response stakeholders 

For purposes of this letter, “emergency response stakeholder” refers to a public health agency and its delegates that have legal responsibility and authority for responding to an incident, based on political or geographical boundary lines (e.g., city, county, tribal, territorial, State, or Federal), or functional (e.g., law enforcement or public health range) or sphere of authority to administer, deliver, or distribute vaccine in an emergency situation. In some cases (e.g., depending on a state or local jurisdiction’s COVID-19 vaccination response organization and plans), there might be overlapping roles and responsibilities among “emergency response stakeholders” and “vaccination providers” (e.g., if a local health department is administering COVID-19 vaccines; if a pharmacy is acting in an  official capacity under the authority of the state health department to administer COVID-19 vaccines). In such cases, it is expected that the conditions of authorization that apply to emergency response stakeholders and vaccination providers will all be met.

 

тут не в английській мові справа, а у знанні мови юристів: Legalese 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

пусть слизистую носа проверят - вообще офигеют и запретят пользоваться носом

это уже почти как "британские ученые"

вот скажите откровенно - вы же понимаете что это желтушная статья с целью словить хайп? для этого и принесли сюда её?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Це не "брєд", а доконаний факт, про який знає будь-який притомний вірусолог. Що на масках концентруються різні патогени і бактерії. Для них там ідеальне середовище для існування, бо ніхто не міняє ті маски кожні 15 хвилин. Сплеск легеневих захворювань і ускладнень очікує макодрочерів самим найближчим часом, якщо вже не відбувається. Які вони  звично зпишуть на КОВІД всюдисущий

Link to comment
Share on other sites




A new twist for vaccine mandates 




Delta Air Lines has opened a new front in the push by companies to get employees vaccinated against the coronavirus. Yesterday, Delta said that workers who aren’t vaccinated by Nov. 1 will have to pay an additional $200 per month to remain on the airline’s health plan. More companies are considering imposing such fees on the unvaccinated, following the airline’s lead.






The shift from incentives like extra pay or time off to get the shot to financial penalties for choosing not to is a noteworthy change in corporate vaccination initiatives. Companies are taking a tougher stance even if they, like Delta, stop short of mandating that workers get the vaccine or lose their jobs.






Recent hospital stays because of Covid have cost Delta about $50,000 per employee, and every one of those workers was not fully vaccinated, Delta’s C.E.O., Ed Bastian, said in a memo to staff. Like most large employers, Delta insures its work force, meaning it pays health costs directly and hires an insurance company to administer its plans.






An insurance surcharge is technically complicated. Because employers can’t charge people with pre-existing health conditions higher insurance prices, the surcharges on the unvaccinated are structured as part of “wellness” incentive programs, which are permitted under the Affordable Care Act. These programs must be voluntary but can involve rewards or penalties as large as 30 percent of an employee’s health insurance premium.





 



How to leverage wellness programs to encourage vaccinations has been a preoccupation in boardrooms, with trade groups pushing regulators for clarification of what was allowed. “This is not rocket science, but it is not easy,” said Rob Duston, a lawyer with Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr. Employees facing surcharges who don’t want to be vaccinated can simply drop out of the company health plan. (Delta also said that unvaccinated employees would have to wear masks indoors, get a weekly Covid test and forgo payment protections if they missed work because of a Covid infection.)






So why not make vaccination mandatory? Companies are on sound legal footing for imposing vaccine mandates for employees. But “every company has to make its own decision for its culture,” Bastian told CNN. “I think these added voluntary steps, short of mandating a vaccine, are going to get us as close to 100 percent as we can.”






Geography and politics play a part. Companies balancing the risks of losing employees, altering company culture and facing political blowback can arrive at different conclusions, even within the same industry. United Airlines, which is based in Chicago, was an early mover in mandating vaccination, but its rivals like Delta, which is based in Atlanta, and American and Southwest, which are based in Texas, haven’t required vaccines. Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas issued an executive order yesterday banning coronavirus vaccine mandates, and Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia has told businesses in the state that they don’t have to comply with local mask or vaccine rules.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

пусть слизистую носа проверят - вообще офигеют и запретят пользоваться носом

это уже почти как "британские ученые"

вот скажите откровенно - вы же понимаете что это желтушная статья с целью словить хайп? для этого и принесли сюда её?

у нас реально в штате война между губером и школьными юнионами за принуждение детей носить маски. тема актуальна,
Link to comment
Share on other sites

у нас реально в штате война между губером и школьными юнионами за принуждение детей носить маски. тема актуальна,

 

но мотивировать тем что на масках что то там собирается - это манипуляция - ибо оно не собирается само собой, а собирается из того же воздуха которым мы дышим

Link to comment
Share on other sites

но мотивировать тем что на масках что то там собирается - это манипуляция - ибо оно не собирается само собой, а собирается из того же воздуха которым мы дышим

собирается конечно. ибо эти грязные тряпки дети носят месяцами. чего на них только не собирается. а потом этим гомном идёт гипер вентиляция легких.

 

+ неизвестно какие последствия из за дыхания собственным паром, недостаче кислорода.

Змінено користувачем Ali(UA)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Вакцина? Не удивительно, их в лабах и разрабатывают. Но если вы говорите о вирусе, то в лабе как он появился? Змінено користувачем Папа_Карлос
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Створити...